Where Corexi and VWO differ.
VWO helps teams test their way to better conversion. Corexi finds the friction worth testing in the first place. Here's how they differ.
What VWO is great at
VWO is a mature experimentation platform — A/B and multivariate testing, personalization, heatmaps and session recordings to validate changes you already have in mind.
Where Corexi takes a different path.
- Finds what to test
A/B tools optimize what you already suspect. Corexi scans the whole product and surfaces the friction costing conversions before you set up an experiment.
- One score across the product
Instead of reviewing data point by point, get a UX Score with prioritized, evidence-backed findings across 9 categories.
- Fix-ready code + accessibility
Every finding ships code; WCAG is axe-core verified; neurodiversity is scored as a first-class dimension.
- Continuous, on every deploy
Corexi re-scans automatically as your product ships — the score is a living pulse, not a one-off snapshot.
Corexi and VWO, row by row.
| Corexi | VWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Role | Find + diagnose + fix | Test hypotheses |
| Starting point | Full-product scan | A change you define |
| Output | Scored findings + code | Experiment results |
| Fix-ready code | Yes, IDE-native | — |
| Accessibility | axe-core verified | — |
It depends on the question you are asking.
You already know what you want to change and need to validate it with rigorous experiments.
You want to discover the UX friction costing conversions — and get the code to fix it.
Better together. Let Corexi surface and fix the highest-impact friction, then use VWO to A/B test the riskier bets.
See what your UX is costing you.
Give it your product's URL. We set up the login with you once; from then on it goes round on its own, after every release.