Where Corexi and Baymard UX-Ray differ.
Baymard brings a deep e-commerce research corpus to automated auditing. Corexi is a continuous, IDE-native layer across all product types. Here's how they differ.
What Baymard UX-Ray is great at
Baymard UX-Ray evaluates e-commerce sites against research-backed guidelines with impressive accuracy — grounded in one of the deepest e-commerce UX research bodies available.
Where Corexi takes a different path.
- All product types, not e-com only
Baymard focuses on e-commerce. Corexi scores SaaS, fintech, healthcare, marketplace and more, tuned per industry.
- Continuous, on every deploy
Corexi re-scans automatically as your product ships — the score is a living pulse, not a one-off snapshot.
- Fix-ready code + accessibility
Every finding ships code; WCAG is axe-core verified; neurodiversity is scored as a first-class dimension.
- In your workflow
Corexi lives in the IDE via MCP and connects behavioral analytics — not a manual scan you read and file away.
Corexi and Baymard UX-Ray, row by row.
| Corexi | Baymard UX-Ray | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | All product types | E-commerce only |
| Cadence | Continuous, every deploy | Manual scan |
| Output | Scored findings + code | Heuristic audit report |
| Fix-ready code | Yes, IDE-native | — |
| Behavioral fusion | 7 analytics providers | — |
It depends on the question you are asking.
You run an e-commerce store and want a deep, research-grounded heuristic audit.
You want continuous UX measurement across any product type, with fix-ready code in your IDE.
Better together. Use Baymard's e-commerce depth for reference; run Corexi continuously for scored, fix-ready diagnosis in your workflow.
See what your UX is costing you.
Give it your product's URL. We set up the login with you once; from then on it goes round on its own, after every release.