Skip to main content
Live demoRead-only — sign up to create your own dashboard.
← Back to siteStart free →
CorexiDashboard

Bolt

bolt.eu· Last scan 11 days ago

Web appGoal: Activation
SettingsCanvas

Analysis Layers

~85% confidence
Visual AIActiveCaptures screenshots across viewports and runs AI vision analysis on layout, typography, spacing, color, and interaction patterns.

Screenshot + 9-category UX analysis

BehavioralActiveFuses real user signals from your analytics (bounce rate, rage clicks, scroll depth, session data) into the scoring engine.

2/8 analytics connected

PX EngineActiveCross-validates visual findings with behavioral data. Higher confidence when both layers are active. Produces the final UX Score.

Hybrid reasoning enabled

UX Score

Weighted composite of 5 UX dimensions: Behavioral Health (30%), Visual Quality (20%), Accessibility (20%), Usability (15%), Cognitive Load (15%). Backed by 200+ peer-reviewed studies.
82

Open findings

34

Trend

+7

AI Insight

Bolt.eu demonstrates strong visual quality (clean layout, consistent spacing, well-structured navigation hierarchy) and good usability patterns. The behavioral layer shows healthy engagement metrics — low bounce rate (24%), strong scroll depth on key pages, and minimal rage clicks. Primary areas for improvement: mobile CTA visibility (hero CTA falls below fold on smaller viewports), contrast ratios on secondary text elements, and cognitive load in the services grid where 6 equally-weighted options compete for attention. The Neurodiversity Lens flags line-height tightness for dyslexic users and some attention fragmentation patterns for ADHD users in the dense feature sections.

Confidence 87%Coverage 78%6/1/2026, 2:03:45 PM

UX Category Scores

Neurodiversity Lens

How well this product serves neurodiverse users.

ADHD Friendliness

83

Measures decision paralysis, attention fragmentation, and information overload that disproportionately affect users with ADHD.

Cognitive loadVisual hierarchyNavigation clarityEngagement flow

Dyslexia Readability

82

Evaluates text readability, font choices, line spacing, and content structure for users with dyslexia.

Visual qualityText clarityAccessibility complianceContent structure

Autism Predictability

83

Assesses consistency of patterns, predictability of interactions, and absence of unexpected changes.

Usability patternsVisual consistencyCognitive predictabilityInteraction stability

Sensory Sensitivity

81

Checks for motion intensity, contrast levels, animation respect, and sensory overload potential.

Visual intensityAccessibility settingsAnimation controlReduced-motion support

Color Vision

79

Measures how accessible your interface is for users with color vision deficiencies (protanopia, deuteranopia, tritanopia).

Color-only informationLuminance contrastColor pair safetyAlternative indicators

Color Vision Accessibility

How accessible for users with color vision deficiencies (8% of males, 0.5% of females).

Protanopia

72

~1% of males

Red-green color blindness. Difficulty distinguishing reds from greens and browns.

Deuteranopia

69

~6% of males

Green-red color blindness. Most common CVD type. Greens, reds, and yellows appear similar.

Tritanopia

75

~0.01%

Blue-yellow color blindness. Difficulty distinguishing blue from green, yellow from violet.

Achromatopsia

63

~0.003%

Complete color blindness. All colors appear as shades of gray. Relies entirely on luminance contrast.

Visual Scan

Screenshots captured across desktop and mobile viewports, analyzed for UX issues.

View full visual scan report
HomepageDesktop 1440px/
8 annotated84

8 annotated findings

Findings (8)

See all →
1high

Low contrast on primary CTA buttons

The 'Get the App' button at the top has a contrast ratio lower than 4.5:1 between the green button background and white text.

2low

Sufficient Line Height

Line height is appropriate for readability.

3low

Good CTA Visibility

CTA buttons are clear, with sufficient contrast and appropriate size.

4medium

Insufficient contrast for text on green backgrounds

Text on green backgrounds in service cards does not meet contrast standards.

5medium

Missing alt text on promotional images

Promo images (e.g., F1 event image) do not have alt text.

6medium

Inconsistent Headline Differentiation

Headings and subheadings are not consistently differentiated across sections.

HomepageiPhone 16 Pro

/

5 findings
86
PageDesktop 1440px

/en/rides/

4 findings
83
PageDesktop 1440px

/en/plus/

4 findings
81

Findings (34)

See all findings
Copy for
highusability/en/food/

Primary CTA lacks sufficient visibility

The 'Get App' button blends with the background due to insufficient contrast (3.5:1).

highusability/en/food/

Low contrast for primary CTA button

The CTA button 'Get the App' has a color contrast ratio of 3.5:1 against the background.

highusability/en/rides/

Primary CTA lacks sufficient contrast

The 'Ride' CTA button has a contrast ratio of 3.5:1 against the background, below the WCAG AA minimum of 4.5:1.

highusability/

Low contrast on primary CTA buttons

The 'Get the App' button at the top has a contrast ratio lower than 4.5:1 between the green button background and white text.

highaccessibility/en/rent/

Missing error page accessibility features

The 404 error page lacks proper semantic structure - no visible heading hierarchy (h1, h2) and no skip navigation options

Scan history

Older runs (your latest is highlighted above).